[gnso-lockpdp-wg] Comments- Surveys

[Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am wondering if not be possible to add some question to now in which domains 
exists more dispute (survey from providers) or maybe something about approved 
dispute-resolution service provider through was initiated the UDRP proceeding. 

Excuse me if I am off-topic, just I was asking me about it and maybe would be 
useful. 
Best Regards,
 
JUAN MANUEL ROJAS
Comunicador Social  
Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia

Twitter: @JmanuRojas

Unete a LACRALO: 
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 







                                                


________________________________
 De: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Para: "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
Enviado: Viernes, 25 de mayo, 2012 5:05 A.M.
Asunto: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review - Surveys
 

Dear All,

Please find attached and posted on the wiki 
(see https://community.icann.org/display/udrpproceedings/Next+Meeting) an 
updated version of the surveys for registrars and UDRP Providers. 

Having looked again at the registrar survey following the WG's discussion 
yesterday, I've made an attempt to further simplify the survey by making the 
starting question 'when' do you lock a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings 
which reduces the amount of questions that need to be asked thereafter. This 
does assume that typically only one kind of lock is applied at one point in 
time by a registrar during UDRP Proceedings. If this is an incorrect 
assumption, we might need to make further changes. I did add one question that 
allows a registrar to specify if they typically change the type of lock applied 
and what the different characteristics are of this other lock. Also, with 
regard to the 'wait period', I looked back to the email explanation that John 
Berryhill sent according to which a 10 day wait period applies in case the 
complainant wins and a 15 day wait period applies in case the registrant wins. 
I've updated this accordingly in the survey (if
 this is incorrect, please let me know). 

For the survey for UDRP providers, the changes made take into account the WG 
discussion yesterday as well as the edits provided by WIPO. I did note that in 
its comments WIPO questioned the relevance / usefulness of some of the 
questions, so maybe that is something the WG can discuss in further detail at 
the next meeting.

Please feel free to share any comments / edits and/or suggestions you may have 
with the mailing list in advance of next week's meeting.

Thanks,

Marika