ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

  • To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report
  • From: "Vanda UOL" <vanda@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:39:32 -0200

I was just comment on the issues. The working group model may be a point to
be stressed as to improve communication among AC/SO.  I am copying everybody
here. 

Best

 

cid:image002.jpg@01C93E96.B7BF8BD0

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Alameda Santos 1470 #1407

Tel - +55.11.3266.6253

Mob- +55.11.8181.1464

vanda@xxxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:26 AM
To: Vanda UOL
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

 

Vanda,

 

Are you suggesting that we make recommendations to the CCT along these
lines?  If so, it would be helpful if you communicated your suggested
recommendations to the full OSC list.

 

Chuck

 

  _____  

From: Vanda UOL [mailto:vanda@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:25 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

Hi Chuk

 

Ken's document looks to have touched all comments among us. 

Communications among AC/SO  as well as Board /GNSO are key points . Board
also needs to review its way to communicate with constituencies and a model
defined by the GNSO may help to define a new standard for board use. ( the
problems are almost the same in all AC/CO:  need of direct communication/
meaningful  and timely responses - may be not with the GAC since they have
more time and their communication/ demands are already formal  and feedback
we may say is always timely provided)

 

A view from outside : before the working groups organization inside GNSO in
other to implement reviews, the communication between GNSO and ALAC may be
considered almost inexistent. Nowadays however, it is not only diverse in
number of participants as have been meaningful at least for ALAC, but I
guess also for GNSO. 

Working groups model , as we area working now,  looks to be the best
interaction alternative we have to keep AC/SO working together. Keeping the
groups working dealing with several issues, with defined time to delivery
the task looks as the best recommendation we may have to continuously
improve AC/SO interaction, contributing also to improve tolerance..

 

Best.

 

cid:image002.jpg@01C93E96.B7BF8BD0

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Alameda Santos 1470 #1407

Tel - +55.11.3266.6253

Mob- +55.11.8181.1464

vanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 7:10 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] Summary of Observations Concerning Final Report

 

Not seeing any volunteers for the OSC memberships, I asked Ken Bour to
prepare a draft response to the CCT WT's final recommendations document.
Ken attempted to incorporate the comments communicated on this list as best
as possible; some were easier that others.

 

Please review and comment on this document with the goal of finalizing it
for sending it to the CCT.  If you approve it, please state so.   If
possible, I would like to finish this task NLT than seven days from today,
25 Nov 09.

 

Thanks, Chuck

JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy