RE: [gnso-osc] FW: FOR ADOPTION May 15 - GCOT Ops Section 2.1 term limits

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry I wasn't clear Philip.  I was changing the subject to the CCT
recommendations, not the Ops Section 2.1.  

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 7:56 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] FW: FOR ADOPTION May 15 - GCOT Ops Section 2.1
> term limits
> Importance: High
> 
> Chuck,
> I rather supossed my words were the motion to adopt?
> Ive also been told off once for changing deadlines so prefer to stick
> with
> the 10 days review period for all OSC and thus May 14 or 15 for
> completion
> of the current 3 items.
> I realise that falls short for the next Council so leave it to Council
> to
> accept with shorter notice or defer till yr next meeting.
> The world will survive such a delay I suspect.
> Philip
> 
> 
> 
> > On the CCT recommendations, we need a motion to be made by 12 May.
> Who
> > is going to make it?
> > > Chuck
> > >
> >
> > From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Reminder
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:29 AM
> > To: 'gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: FOR ADOPTION May 15 - GCOT Ops Section 2.1 term limits
> >
> > Dear OSC members,
> >
> > FOR REVIEW AND ADOPTION by May 15
> >
> >
> >
> > Please find attached a revised Section 2.1 of the GNSO operating
> manual
> > covering term-limits for Council members.
> >
> > The  proposal  from GCOT seems sound and the high voting thresholds
> for
> > exceptions are consistent with thresholds for other issues.
> >
> > I propose until May 15  for your  approvals or other comments.
> >
> >
> >
> > Philip
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>