ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6

  • To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: AW: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:46:53 -0400

Hi,

I am fine with the rules as written. 

However I would also be ok with modifying the first sentence of 4.6 to read:

A proxy notification must be sent to the GNSO secretariat by the Proxy Giver's 
appoint organization (if applicable) and should indicate which type it is.

a.

On 16 May 2011, at 08:27, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> According to the existing process the proxy notification should be sent by 
> the Proxy Giver'S appointing organization (if applicable)
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag 
> von Philip Sheppard
> Gesendet: Montag, 16. Mai 2011 12:04
> An: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - v6
> 
> 
> In view of the comments from Legal, I propose this new version of the rules.
> I have highlighted in yellow changes (all additions) from v5.
> 
> Comments, expressions of support with a view to OSC adoption by May 26 please.
> 
> Philip
> OSC Chair
> 
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy