Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] IPC comment for PEDNR

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi Alan,

today was a travel day, so i'm late to the party.

but i'll join the rest in supporting (and commending) your reply.

thanks,

mikey


On Sep 21, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

> The IPC submitted a very substantive comment regarding the PEDNR report - see 
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/pednr-board-recommendations-15aug11-en.htm.
> 
> I felt that some of their comments needed to be addressed, as they could be 
> inferred as saying that the WG was less than meticulous in reviewing the 
> comments we received to the draft report.
> 
> I have taken the liberty of replying. This was done purely on my only behalf 
> and I made that clear. Nevertheless, I think (hope?) that the comments do 
> reflect the views of the WG when it reviewed the original IPC comments. A 
> copy of my posting is attached.
> 
> As Marika has not yet summarized the comments, I am hoping that my new post 
> will be reflected in that summary. This is in line with the future plans to 
> have a "reply" cycle in future comment periods.
> 
> If anyone feels that I have mis-represented the WG, please let me and Marika 
> know ASAP and I will do what I can to fix it.
> 
> Alan<Reply to IPC.pdf>

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)