ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-rap-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-rap-dt] Volunteers needed for drafting team on Registration Abuse Policies

  • To: "gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-rap-dt] Volunteers needed for drafting team on Registration Abuse Policies
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:34:00 -0800

Dear All,

Kristina Rosette has volunteered for the IPC so there are now 4 volunteers for 
the drafting team approved in the following resolution that the Council passed 
at its 18 December 2008 meeting. (see resolution below)

Kristina Rosette - IPC 
Mike Rodenbaugh - CBUC
Greg Aaron - Registry c.
James Bladel - Registrar c.

The mailing list address is:
gnso-rap-dt@xxxxxxxxx

and the public archives are at
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-rap-dt/

Thank you for your urgent attention.
Kind regards,

Glen


Resolution on the GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies

Whereas:

The GNSO Issues Report on Registration Abuse Policies indicated that further 
review, evaluation and study be done before a PDP is initiated,

Resolved:

That a drafting team be formed to create a proposed charter for a working group 
to investigate the open issues documented in the issues report on Registrations 
Abuse Policy. Specifically:

9.1 Review and Evaluate Findings
A first step would be for the GNSO Council to review and evaluate the findings, 
taking into account that this report provides an overview of registration abuse 
provisions, but does not analyse how these provisions are implemented in 
practice and whether they are deemed effective in addressing registration abuse.
9.2 Identify specific policy issues
Following the review and evaluation of the findings, the GNSO Council would 
need to determine whether there are specific policy issues regarding 
registration abuse. As part of this determination it would be helpful to define 
the specific type(s) of abuse of concern, especially distinguishing between 
registration abuse and other types of abuse if relevant.
9.3 Need for further research
As part of the previous two steps, ICANN Staff would recommend that the GNSO 
Council determines where further research may be needed - e.g. is lack of 
uniformity a substantial problem, how effective are current registration abuse 
provisions in addressing abuse in practice, is an initial review or analysis of 
the UDRP required?

The WG charter should be ready for review by the council on or before 15 
January 2009 and will be voted on at the council meeting of 29 January 2009 at 
which time the councl will take the by-laws required PDP vote.

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy