RE: [gnso-sti] URS Elements

[<McGradyP@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Kathy.  I take it that the revisions do not capture deletions,
for example the elimination of "or confusingly similar" in your draft
which significantly narrows the scope of the URS, which of course is not
acceptable.  

Is it possible for your team to prepare a comparison copy between your
proposal and the UDRP elements so that we can see both additions as well
as deletions?  Thanks in advance.


Paul D. McGrady, Jr.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, IL 60601

312 456 8426 tel

312 899 0407 fax

mcgradyp@xxxxxxxxx

Assistant: Loyanna Grierson (312) 236-4952 Direct Dial (312) 456-8435
Facsimile griersonl@xxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:Kathy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:31 PM
To: McGrady, Paul D. (Shld-Chi-IP/Tech)
Cc: gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-sti] URS Elements

Hi Paul,
Tx for asking. Yes, I tried to capture all the edits from the UDRP for
the URS in blue.
Best,
Kathy
> Kathy,
>
> For clarity purposes, are your changes to the UDRP baseline elements 
> in blue, or only certain portions?  Thanks!
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
> Paul D. McGrady, Jr. 
> Greenberg Traurig, LLP
> 77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2500
> Chicago, IL 60601
> 312 456 8426 tel
> 312 899 0407 fax
> mcgradyp@xxxxxxxxx
> Assistant:  Loyanna Grierson (312) 236-4952 Direct Dial (312) 456-8435

> Facsimile griersonl@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Links: www.paulmcgrady.com and www.mcgradyondomainnames.com
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>     Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S.
federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.
>  
>     The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use
of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email
administrator directly, please send an email to
mailto:postmaster@xxxxxxxxx.
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>  
> From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:38 PM
> To: gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-sti] URS Elements
>
> All,
> We were asked by the STI to evaluate the elements of the UDRP and 
> revise them consistent with the goals and functions of the URS. It 
> turns out it was not as difficult as we expected. Attached please find

> the URS Elements -- a slightly revised set of UDRP elements focused 
> directly on the "clear-cut abuse" cases of the URS, and clear-cut 
> evidence this summary proceeding requires.
>
> Best,
> Kathy, Konstantinos, Wendy and Robin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> http://www.gtlaw.com/
>
>