ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-sti]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-sti] Missing e-mail and minor correction to v5

  • To: "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso sti" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Missing e-mail and minor correction to v5
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:13:39 -0500

I did not receive it eiter.

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 5:55 PM
To: Alan Greenberg; gnso sti
Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Missing e-mail and minor correction to v5


Thanks Alan,

I wonder if it is because of the size of the document?  When I added the
Board Letter picture, for some reason the size of the file was quite
large-- 26MB instead of 352 KB from yesterday's document.

Hopefully all of you can access it on the archives.

All the Best,

Margie


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:28 PM
To: gnso sti
Subject: [gnso-sti] Missing e-mail and minor correction to v5


I noticed several replies with "v5" in the subject and first thought 
they were in error, but I just checked the archives and see that 
Margie did send out a v5 version at 9 am PST today. I didn't receive 
it (checked all of my mail boxes including spam) - just wanted to let 
others know in case I was not the only one.

I found one minor correction - URS 4.2 - in my last corrections, I 
neglected to say to delete the word "Default" from the text of the 
recommendation (same reason as deleting it from the title).

Alan






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy