[gnso-vi-feb10] RE: proposed rewording of Objective 5

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Margie;
I agree with "current and past" but no, I don't think I can agree to adding 
"restrictions and practices." As GNSO we are interested only in consistency 
with policy, not with "practices and restrictions". I view that as a 
tendentious change.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margie Milam [mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:46 PM
> To: Milton L Mueller; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: proposed rewording of Objective 5
> 
> Milton,
> 
> I suggest rewording Objective 5 slightly to replace the term "current
> policies" with "current and past restrictions and practices" to be
> consistent with the other objectives and our prior discussions.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Margie
> 
> ___________
> 
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> ___________
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:46 AM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] proposed rewording of Objective 5
> 
> 
> 
> Objective 5: To determine whether the changes to the current restrictions
> and/or practices concerning registry-registrar separation and equal access
> contained in the options set out in DAGv3 constitute an unacceptable
> deviation from current policies regarding registry-registrar sewparation.
> 
> Rationale: this does not require research or an open-ended assessment of
> the entire registry-registrar market, but a simple determination that the
> DAGv3 proposals are an unauthorized policy change.
> 
> --MM