ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time

  • To: Anthony Harris <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time
  • From: Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:22:29 -0400


Ken Stubbs wrote:

I have the same concerns...


On 6/15/2010 11:28 AM, Anthony Harris wrote:

I agree with Tim's suggestion.

Tony Harris

----- Original Message ----- From: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time



I'm concerned abt how these polls will be used in the report. I agree with Kathy abt the value of the matrix and its use in the report, but these polls are confusing.

I will try to get to the current poll later this week (traveling a lot until Friday), but suggest that the poll results not be used in the report to Council.

Tim

------Original Message------
From: Mike O'Connor
Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
To: Avri Doria
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Poll -- NEW ONE -- looking at "atoms" this time
Sent: Jun 14, 2010 2:28 PM


hi all,

we had a pretty lively conversation on the call about the new poll and concluded that we need a redo that makes the choices/answers easier to understand. Doodle seems to be at it's limit. so i've closed the Doodle one and will push a new one (probably SurveyMonkey based, since i've got an account) Real Soon Now.

thanks,


mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax  866-280-2356
web www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)










<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy