ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[npoc-voice]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[npoc-voice] Fwd: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] questions from chat room - Dakar JAS WG session

  • To: npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [npoc-voice] Fwd: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] questions from chat room - Dakar JAS WG session
  • From: Alain Berranger <alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:10:43 -0400

Dear NPOC Colleagues,

FYI

Best, Alain

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Cintra Sooknanan <cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] questions from chat room - Dakar JAS WG
session
To: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "<soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>,
"mailto:isoaltednet@xxxxxxxxx"; <isoaltednet@xxxxxxxxx>


Hello Everyone,

Attached is my account of the questions and comments raised at the session
today.

It continues to be a pleasure to contribute with you all in this working
group and I wish to echo Carlton's appreciation and thanks to staff.

Great Job!

Cintra


On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Dear all:****
>
> ** **
>
> 29 to 31 remote participants during the session, including Rafik Dammak.**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> **1.       ***Joly MacFie*: Q: Will eligible applicants include those
> looking for IDN's and variants?****
>
> ** **
>
> **2.       ***Faisal Hasan*: I have a question...its about the new gTLD
> communications and outreach program...is there any plan to organize sessions
> to promote and inform the application rules to business communities at
> developing countries... Is there any way ISOC Chapters can help in this
> program?****
>
> ** **
>
> **3.       ***Sivasubramanian M (from ISOC India Chennai)*: In the new
> gTLD application process, ICANN does not recognize the existence of an
> earlier application form for a new string, so it is possible for more than
> one applicant for any original string that an applicant applies for.  In
> this framework, it is possible that there may be cases where the chances of
> a weak applicant is jeopardized by a powerful actor who discovers the value
> of the string proposed by the first applicant and makes a second applicant .
> Did JAS group look into this problem? Could there be any method or
> convention by which the JAS could support the smaller or Start-Up applicants
> from being run over?****
>
> ** **
>
> We answered the first 2, but not the third question from* Sivasubramanian,
> *cc on this message. He has been encouraged to participate in the public
> comment.****
>
> ** **
>
> Excellent work today!!!!****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you,****
>
> ** **
>
> Karla Valente****
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs****
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)  ****
>
> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878  ****
>
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639  ****
>
> *Skype: **kdlvalente*****
>
> ** **
>




-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Trustee, GKP Foundation, www.globalknowledgepartnership.org
Vice Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger

Attachment: Comments at the JAS WG presentation.doc
Description: MS-Word document



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy