ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] RE: List of Discussion Threads

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] RE: List of Discussion Threads
  • From: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:26:05 +0200

Good list, Chuck.

B.

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Thanks Konstantinos.  I will add it as thread # 14.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:42 AM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: List of Discussion Threads
>
>
>
> Thanks for this Chuck, it is really helpful and provides a great outline of
> the issues we discussed yesterday. I would also add the use of ‘incitement’
> as a term for the determination of morality and public order. If I recall
> some of us, including myself, do not see how a simple gTLD would be able to
> ‘incite’ any illegal activity, not at least in the way the term is used in
> criminal law.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Konstantinos
>
>
>
> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
>
> Law Lecturer,
>
> Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
>
> University of Strathclyde,
>
> The Law School,
>
> The Lord Hope Building,
>
> 141 St. James Road,
>
> Glasgow, G4 0LT
>
> UK
>
> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
>
>
> http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
>
> Selected publications:
> http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
>
> Website: www.komaitis.org
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:24 PM
> *To:* soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [soac-mapo] List of Discussion Threads
>
>
>
>  It seems to me that it would be helpful if we can arrange the discussion
> into discrete topics that would be used for different threads of discussion
> so as to be able to track agreement/disagreement separately for each one.
> Here is a list of possible threads that I developed from my meeting notes,
> email discussion and the chat discussion from the meeting:
>
> 1.      International Principles of Law
>
> 2.      Use of ‘Morality’ & ‘Public Order’ Terms
>
> 3.      Quick Look Procedure
>
> 4.      Outsourcing of Dispute Resolution Process
>
> 5.      International Center of Expertise of the ICC as DRSP
>
> 6.      Incitement to discrimination criterion
>
> 7.      Universal Availability Objective with Limited Exceptions
>
> 8.      Independent Objector
>
> 9.      Timing of Rec6 Dispute Resolution
>
> 10.     Standing for filing objections
>
> 11.     High Board Threshold for Approving/Rejecting Rec6 DRSP Decisions
>
> 12.     String only?
>
> 13.     Guidebook Criterion 4
>
> Did I miss any threads?  If so, please identify them.
>
> I understand that these are not all mutually exclusive and that discussion
> of any one thread will likely involve some discussion of other threads as
> well, but by using these subjects in our email discussions, I think we might
> be able to consolidate our work more easily.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Chuck
>



-- 
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy