RE: [soac-mapo] Update- Rec6 Action Item URGENT input from CWG is required by January 7th 2011.
Agree with Evan. ________________________________________ From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch [evan@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 8:51 PM To: Richard Tindal Cc: Robin Gross; Cheryl Langdon-Orr; soac-mapo; Chuck Gomes; Heather.Dryden Dryden; Frank March; Van Gelder Stéphane; Jon Nevett; Neuman Jeff; Kurt Pritz; Margie Milam Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Update- Rec6 Action Item URGENT input from CWG is required by January 7th 2011. I disagree thoroughly. The IO is integral to many of the objections to the status quo. Glossing over them at this point does not address such this fundamental problem and leaves it to fester. Part of the reason we are here, dealing with this core issue so late in the TLD process, is because of previous tendencies to sweep contentious issues under the rug in the name of expediency, hoping that in the future they'll be forgotten or just bullied past. I prefer to learn from mistakes rather than repeat them. This issue will not magically just go away through one more deferment. - Evan On 2 January 2011 18:17, Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx<mailto:richardtindal@xxxxxx>> wrote: I think our current mission is to address the three items in the Board's Cartagena resolution (per Margie's 24 Dec note). IO wasn't one of them, so I propose we leave any revisiting of that issue to the end of our discussions. Richard