XXX domains are not a good idea

["The Irate F.O.X." <the.irate.fox@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear ICANN,

This email is a comment in opposition to the Proposed Registry Agreement for
the .XXX sTLD by ICM Registry. The .XXX sTLD should be rejected in finality
for the following reasons:

* The .xxx TLD is opposed by every sector and community it affects. This
includes people working in the adult entertainment industry (including
Hustler, Vivid, Penthouse, XBIZ, porn’s Free Speech Coalition, and Adult

Friend Finder), anti-porn family and religious organizations (including The
Family Research Council), thought leaders in the technology sector, and the
ACLU.

* Despite ICM’s constant assurances of various industry representation and

support, there is no evidence of community support for .XXX.

* The .xxx TLD will do nothing to solve problems surrounding adult content,
manage adult content or protect children from inappropriate content. The

higher purposes of ICM’s proposal have been abandoned. (As of this email the
page on ICM Registry’s website about “Promoting Online Responsibility” for
.XXX is blank and reads “*Information to follow*” as does the page titled

“Contracts, Policies and Bylaws.”)

* There has been absolutely no proof of an “unmet need” for the .XXX TLD.

* There is no concrete, agreed-upon definition of “adult content.”

* The ACLU expresses serious concerns about the implications of .XXX outside

the U.S., where in some countries, regulations around .XXX would certainly
be enforced punitively. To this effect, the .XXX TLD raises human rights
concerns.

* .XXX makes no business sense except to profit from defensive registration

(brand squatting).

* Senators Max Baucus (D-MT) and Mark Pryor (D-AR) have introduced
legislation to make the use of .XXX compulsory for all web sites that are
“harmful to minors.”

* .XXX raises serious issues around spurious and unsupported TLD’s in regard

to the impact of ICANN on rulings on civil and human rights, and ICANN’s
role in content-based discrimination.

In light of the above, I object to .XXX and urge ICANN to reject .XXX.

Regards,

TIF

P.S. In addition to the essential form points above I believe that this would
be detrimental to the interests of local and small business interests
in addition
to sites that do not operate on a profit motive.  The .XXX domain segment is

both un-necessary and useless.  Please do not continue with an un-necessary and
widely disliked project which has no rational usefulness in any
conceivable context.


-- 
I wish you intelligence, I would wish you luck but it runs out much faster
than you'd think.