No to XXX

[phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Having been professionally involved with producing adult content for more than 
40 years i feel well qualified to comment on the proposed XXXs Tld .I have 
worked in most countries including: Europe, Japan, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, 
Malaysia, Thailand and the USA (California).
 
 For the record i am vehemently opposed to the proposed XXXs Tld for the 
following reasons:
 
Full disclosure has not been made with regard to IFFOR its policy's and board 
members. The aims, plolicy's and / or rules must be published in advance of any 
ruling on the XXXs Tld To allow the adult industry to fully understand the 
implications of this new offering.
 
Insufficient time has been allowed for comment. After the IFFOR details have 
been fully disclosed a reasonable reply time of 90 days should be allowed.
 
I read that pre registration  is being allowed by those opposed to the XXXsTld, 
no doubt by people out to name squat with the intent to profit from genuine 
professionals in the adult industry. This will lead to conflict and  law suits 
at a time when we should be fighting the real problem in adult, that of tube 
sites stealing content and making freely available to all including minors ?
 
I believe the main thrust of introducing the XXXs TLD was supposedly for the 
protection of minors on the Internet, Why do we need yet another body when we 
have FSC who for years have led the fight against child pornography and helped 
in no small part to regulate the adult industry in a professiona,l efficient 
and effective manor. Its obvious to me and the many people i meet and work with 
within the adult world that the only intent here is to make money by forcing 
the adult industry over to yet another Tld sold at very inflated prices.
 
Without exception everyone i talk to is against the XXXs Tld. In my opinion it 
would be a very serious mistake to allow this to continue and i sincerely 
request that you deny the operation of the XXXs Tld
 
 
Legal Pictures California