Absolutely no to XXX

[admin <fraud@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Having been professionally involved with producing adult content for more than 
40 years i feel well qualified to comment on the proposed XXXs Tld .I have 
worked in most contries including: Europe, Japan, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, 
Malaysia, Thailand and the USA (California).
 
 For the record i am vermantly opposed to the proposed XXXs Tld for the 
following reasons:
 
Full disclosure has not been made with regard to IFFOR its policys and board 
members. The aims, ploliceys and / or rules must be published in advance of any 
ruling on the XXXs Tld
 
Insufisent time has been allowed for comment. After the IFFOR details have been 
fully disclosed a reasonable reply time of 90 days should be allowed.
 
I read that pre registration  is being allowed by those opposed to the XXXsTld, 
no doubt by people out to name squat with the intent to profit from genuine 
proffessionals in the adult industry. This will lead to conflict and  law suits 
at a time when we should be fighting the real problem in adult, that of tube 
sites stealing content and making freely available to all including minors ?
 
I believe the main thrust of introducing the XXXs TLD was supposedly for the 
protection of minors on the internet, why do we need yet another body when we 
have FSC who for years have led the fight against child pornography and helped 
in no small part to regulate the adult industry in a professional efficient and 
effective manor