Re: [alac] WIPO2 comments to ICANN
A question :) ".... Country Names The language on country names once again relies upon criteria applied to the "registration or use" of domain names. The same concerns as above apply. Once again, it seems more appropriate to give each country control of its name (and any other character strings it chooses) in its unique ccTLD, not to grant it monopoly rights in strings across all TLDs." I don't understand so good, the second idea.... " give each country control of its name".. the idea is give "each country (government)" the control of cctld ? so... give the control of nic ??... I don't support this idea, and some people fight with similar idea in the WSIS document, the cctld administration and the "rights" about .xx (based in the iso 3166-1 alpha 2), is not "appropriate" to give "some kind of" control in the cctld administration. Maybe i don't read good, and wendy can tell-me what mean this phrase! :) Erick At 06:23 p.m. 11/05/2003 -0700, Wendy Seltzer wrote: Attached (and at <http://wendy.seltzer.org/icann/alac-on-wipo2.html> in rough HTML) is our statement on WIPO's recommendations to ICANN, revised from draft to note the public comment we received. We'll send this to Louis Touton tomorrow, as requested.
|