Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Tue, April 24, 2001 at 8:46 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Which is why I said - "If it was ICANN"
Message:
ALSO why I added question mark at end of subject line. Given their record for abuse of process and violation of free speech rights (making DNS a trademark system), ICANN was most likely candidate. You have now stated that it was not them. I will let the original post to this thread stand, as it contains other valid remarks.
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• ICANN suppress freedom of speech again? — Garry Anderson, April 22, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (2/5)
• Why are you surprised? Communist China Deletes messages to... — psbyowner, April 23, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (1/2)
• RE:why are you surprised — anthonyo, April 25, 2001 @ 6:21 AM (1/1)
• They disobey the rules and ignore law — Garry Anderson, April 25, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)
• ICANN did NOT suppress your freedom of speech! — InternetAdvocate, April 23, 2001 @ 8:04 PM (1/1)
• Which is why I said - "If it was ICANN" — Garry Anderson, April 24, 2001 @ 8:46 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy