Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Thu, May 17, 2001 at 3:54 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 4.0
Subject:	New TLD for trademarks is needed.
Message:
(1) dot-rmk (.rmk) for registered mark, or... (2) dot-rtm (.rtm) and dot-rsm (.rsm) for trademarks and servicemarks, respectively. Garry Anderson is right.  [Except, I don't like dot-reg.]

Message Thread:

• New TLD for trademarks is needed. — InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 3:54 AM (1/11)
• Thank you — Garry Anderson, May 17, 2001 @ 8:09 AM (1/10)
• Do you really like uk domain? I think .brit better than .uk — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (1/9)
• Personal preference irrelevant — Garry Anderson, June 6, 2001 @ 5:43 PM (1/8)
• Majority preferences ARE relevant. — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 9:14 PM (1/7)
• Yucky — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (1/6)
• Yucky! Yuck! — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (1/5)
• UK makes perfect sense to us in UK — Garry Anderson, June 9, 2001 @ 1:10 PM (1/4)
• .uk yuck! — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/3)
• Are .zr registrants forced to change to .cd? — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 11:30 PM (1/2)
• You miss point - again and again ... — Garry Anderson, June 10, 2001 @ 9:32 AM (1/1)
• You'd REALLY make a perfect ICANN CEO. You keep missing the point ad nauseum! :) — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy