Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Wed, June 6, 2001 at 5:43 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Personal preference irrelevant
Message:
Personal preferences are irrelevant - as is the logical choice for ccTLD and ccSLD that has been chosen. America already have .us - then they will have to adopt .amer as per your ccTLD requirement - for standardization (as there should be). Do you think they will go for it? Neither do I. To answer your hypothetical question - .com.uk is the answer as both personal and logical choice, in place of co.uk. Businesses have spent a fortune promoting their Internet identity. Though you have good ideas - it would be silly and costly to change TLD now. Not that the ICANN listen to us anyway ;-)
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• New TLD for trademarks is needed. — InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 3:54 AM (1/11)
• Thank you — Garry Anderson, May 17, 2001 @ 8:09 AM (1/10)
• Do you really like uk domain? I think .brit better than .uk — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (1/9)
• Personal preference irrelevant — Garry Anderson, June 6, 2001 @ 5:43 PM (1/8)
• Majority preferences ARE relevant. — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 9:14 PM (1/7)
• Yucky — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (1/6)
• Yucky! Yuck! — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (1/5)
• UK makes perfect sense to us in UK — Garry Anderson, June 9, 2001 @ 1:10 PM (1/4)
• .uk yuck! — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/3)
• Are .zr registrants forced to change to .cd? — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 11:30 PM (1/2)
• You miss point - again and again ... — Garry Anderson, June 10, 2001 @ 9:32 AM (1/1)
• You'd REALLY make a perfect ICANN CEO. You keep missing the point ad nauseum! :) — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy