Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	spot
Date/Time:	Fri, October 5, 2001 at 3:10 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Why should landrusher's lose their generics just because of sunrise cybersquatters?
Message:
That's not fair- I spent hundreds of hours checking the whois and preregistering with multiple companies. It wouldn't be fair to lose the best of my bunch, just because of other people's false apps in sunrise. Sunrise fakes should be put back in the pool- not all generics. We at least deserve ours for being patient and playing by the rules.

Message Thread:

• The Solution to the Dot-Info Debacle is SO easy ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4 @ 11:56 PM (3/11)
• Why should landrusher's lose their generics just because of sunrise cybersquatters? — spot, October 5 @ 3:10 AM (3/3)
• Point Taken.  Here's a revision to the suggestion... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 8:49 PM (0/0)
• you're "spot on" SPOT! — antipodes, October 5 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)
• agreed w/ spot. dont hurt the honest ones! eom — psbyowner, October 5 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)
• you must be kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — antipodes, October 5 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)
• Not kidding... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
• I hate to have to agree with you... — rachelmacgregor, October 5 @ 1:57 AM (2/4)
• I've changed my mind, I don't agree with you after all — rachelmacgregor, October 5 @ 8:50 PM (1/2)
• Rachel admits she loves crap. LOL.  She forgot her medication... — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 9:07 PM (1/1)
• Rachel's agreement very long, but her second post extra short.  What gives? — InternetAdvocate, October 5 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
• What .info Needs — dtobias, October 5 @ 3:09 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy