Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	cambler
Date/Time:	Sat, October 20, 2001 at 12:50 AM GMT (Fri, October 19, 2001 at 4:50 PM PST)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V6.0b using Windows 98
Subject:	I think you miss my point
Message:
My point was that I was calling out the difference in your proposal from giving a name that resolves vs. giving an "attractive" name that resolves. Since our goal has been, since day one, to run a TLD registry, if your proposal has utility, the 2nd level .com that we would put it under should be irrelevant. Otherwise, it just sounds like you're trying to convince IOD to spend a lot of money on web.com and then spend even more money and time dealing with collisions. That's not a productive use of either. If putting everything under web.com makes sense because it provides resolution services, then putting it under webtld.com should make just as much sense. So, in that respect, I'd be pleased to consider it. We could implement it in a weekend. Show of hands? Christopher Ambler CTO, Image Online Design, Inc. The .Web Internet Domain Registry http://webtld.com

Message Thread:

• Image Online Design — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 3:31 PM (6/36)
• IOD should buy web.net's domain name ... — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 4:18 AM (1/4)
• Duh. — S. Hudgens, October 19 @ 1:50 PM (1/3)
• No Duh! — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 10:44 PM (1/2)
• Response. — S. Hudgens, October 20 @ 2:59 AM (1/1)
• Rebuttal ... — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)
• IOD should buy web.com ... — InternetAdvocate, October 18 @ 1:31 AM (1/10)
• Are you on drugs? — kodo, October 18 @ 2:24 AM (2/9)
• You think New.Net is on drugs too? — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 3:45 AM (1/7)
• I don't see it — cambler, October 19 @ 4:59 AM (1/6)
• LOL. — InternetAdvocate, October 19 @ 11:09 PM (1/5)
• I think you miss my point — cambler, October 20 @ 12:50 AM (1/4)
• I understood your point ... — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:22 AM (2/3)
• Oops. — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)
• I admit that web.net is a much better deal than web.com — InternetAdvocate, October 22 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)
• No, thanks — cambler, October 22 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
• COMPETITION with .com? — Garry Anderson, October 18 @ 8:24 AM (0/0)
• keep in mind what business ICANN is in.....   .com — stuart, October 17 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
• ummm... I wanted media.web but its taken, can I get it if IOD become the .web registrar? eom — mole, October 17 @ 6:01 PM (3/10)
• Me too — cambler, October 18 @ 6:57 AM (0/0)
• Well I wanted rockport.info — kodo, October 18 @ 2:28 AM (2/7)
• City names — Garry Anderson, October 18 @ 8:30 AM (0/0)
• Question is, do I have a fair chance to media.web if IOD becomes the .web ICANN registrar? — mole, October 18 @ 3:41 AM (1/5)
• Fair chance? — S. Hudgens, October 18 @ 1:22 PM (1/4)
• Touche! This is the very reason why 20,000 premium secured .web domains is premafreezing IOD..eom — mole, October 18 @ 6:55 PM (1/3)
• IOD is the .WEB choice! — S. Hudgens, October 18 @ 7:52 PM (1/2)
• My dear Mr. Hudgens, — mole, October 18 @ 8:10 PM (1/1)
• I know... — S. Hudgens, October 18 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
• Why didn't you register it before someone else did? — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)
• Afilias : "This sham of a company" — rachelmacgregor, October 17 @ 4:26 PM (0/0)
• ICANN will use the .info and .biz failures to justify inaction — Anion, October 17 @ 3:43 PM (2/6)
• IOD can and will do it! — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)
• I agree... this is the end of new tld launches except what's owed — mole, October 17 @ 3:54 PM (1/4)
• Political Pressure — S. Hudgens, October 17 @ 4:08 PM (1/3)
• DoC is Department of Chickens — Garry Anderson, October 17 @ 6:07 PM (1/2)
• DoC is Department of Corruptoids — InternetAdvocate, October 18 @ 1:55 AM (1/1)
• And thank you for your support — Garry Anderson, October 18 @ 8:40 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy