Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Sat, October 20, 2001 at 11:00 PM GMT (Sat, October 20, 2001 at 4:00 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
Subject:	Good points...
Message:
"Domain names are NOT trademarks. And having a Trademark should NOT give you the right to hijack someone else's domain, and legitimate internet presence...There is a very strong case for arguing that Trademarks should be represented in a .Reg or .TM TLD, and that Trademarks should simply afford a claim in a single registry set up for that purpose." Good points. But .tm is Turkmenistan.  I suggest .rtm for registered trademarks.

Message Thread:

• Reversed Domain Hijacking: The rules — spot, October 19 @ 7:29 PM (2/27)
• What flipping rules? — Garry Anderson, October 20 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
• answers — DaveKing2, October 19 @ 11:59 PM (2/25)
• landrush registrations — onmove, October 20 @ 8:05 PM (1/19)
• I don't see it... — cambler, October 20 @ 9:05 PM (1/18)
• Please consider this....... — onmove, October 20 @ 9:48 PM (1/17)
• I don't think so — cambler, October 20 @ 9:59 PM (1/16)
• What gives people the right to own the Internet? — rachelmacgregor, October 20 @ 10:20 PM (3/15)
• Agreed! — DaveKing2, October 21 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)
• All common dictionary words shouldn't have been claimable in the Sunrise process at all ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
• Bruce Springsteen - new TLD — Garry Anderson, October 21 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
• Good points... — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)
• Big Business has no right to annex the Internet — rachelmacgregor, October 20 @ 10:54 PM (2/10)
• Re: Big Business has no right to annex the Internet. — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 11:46 PM (0/0)
• "The Internet Parliament" to govern ICANN — rachelmacgregor, October 20 @ 11:07 PM (2/8)
• Won't work — cambler, October 20 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)
• Your 'Internet Parliament' idea is dangerous ... — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 11:33 PM (1/6)
• Ending ICANN's Autonomy — rachelmacgregor, October 21 @ 12:00 AM (3/5)
• Rebuttals Galore... — InternetAdvocate, October 21 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
• dubious — richard_henderson, October 21 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)
• If you want some control of ICANN — Garry Anderson, October 21 @ 12:09 AM (1/2)
• Really? — cambler, October 21 @ 12:47 AM (1/1)
• No - I just made it up ;-) — Garry Anderson, October 21 @ 1:36 AM (0/0)
• This is mostly based on Trade Marks... — psbyowner, October 20 @ 6:03 PM (2/4)
• If ICANN is accountable to the US Government, to which office are complaints to be sent? — spot, October 21 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)
• Duh. Precedents. — InternetAdvocate, October 20 @ 10:45 PM (1/2)
• thanks for the correction — psbyowner, October 21 @ 3:50 PM (1/1)
• You're welcome, ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy