Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	S. Hudgens
Date/Time:	Fri, October 26, 2001 at 1:52 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Amen...
Message:
We finally agree on something! You say IOD's technical merits aren't in question.  I think nearly everybody that posts here would agree...those that don't are welcome to provide evidence to the contrary. Perhaps you have misunderstood us all along.  What is wrong with posting support for a company that has far superior technical merits, but got screwed by ICANN?  I personally like .WEB, but would have also been happy with .info.  The point is, we post not in support of the TLD, but in support of the company.  That is the difference.  Just so happens that alot of us like .WEB! Shelby Hudgens

Message Thread:

• My Response to Challenge's questions..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25 @ 11:01 PM (2/27)
• You guys (IODits) still don't get it.. — challenge, October 26 @ 1:16 AM (3/15)
• Know thyself, I tell you again. — cello, October 26 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
• Personal attacks...the last resort of the desperate. — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 2:25 AM (1/9)
• Those honorable intentions — challenge, October 26 @ 2:59 AM (3/8)
• Good Morning! — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)
• ahem.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26 @ 3:36 AM (2/4)
• (Off-topic) Real Names and getting personal — challenge, October 26 @ 11:50 AM (2/2)
• Getting personal — Garry Anderson, October 26 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
• How noble. — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
• True names — Garry Anderson, October 26 @ 10:50 AM (0/0)
• One more thing (my last post on this topic) — challenge, October 26 @ 3:19 AM (1/1)
• Amen... — S. Hudgens, October 26 @ 1:52 PM (0/0)
• unofficial? (long) — cambler, October 26 @ 1:32 AM (2/3)
• Creation of new TLDs — Garry Anderson, October 26 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
• IOD's dot-web will offer competition, but ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 1:46 AM (1/1)
• Fine! — cambler, October 26 @ 2:16 AM (0/0)
• .BIZ competes against .COM — Jim Fleming, October 25 @ 11:08 PM (1/10)
• Not quite! Only somewhat... — InternetAdvocate, October 25 @ 11:17 PM (1/9)
• I agree — cgrady, October 26 @ 12:01 AM (1/8)
• A 'completely different ball park.' Sticky rather than sleezy! ROFLOL... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 12:21 AM (2/7)
• :-) No really ... — cgrady, October 26 @ 12:54 AM (1/1)
• Yes, really ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)
• .WWW vs .WEB — Jim Fleming, October 26 @ 12:29 AM (2/4)
• No www needed with .web — cambler, October 26 @ 1:13 AM (1/1)
• Cute... — InternetAdvocate, October 28 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)
• I say: www should be prefix, not suffix. — InternetAdvocate, October 26 @ 12:50 AM (1/1)
• I agree — cgrady, October 26 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy