.con or .bad? don't call us, we'll call you. NEXT!

Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Buddha

Date/Time: Wed, October 31, 2001 at 2:16 AM GMT

Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0

Subject: .con or .bad? don't call us, we'll call you. NEXT!

Message:

"Dot-CON or dot-bad is much better than dot-sucks.
TLDs should never be slang [like sucks]."
Microsoft.bad HAHAHAHAHAHA! Yeah, that sounds really heavy.
.sucks is way better than .con or .bad. roflmao. Those REALLY suck. But thanks for the chuckle. ".con" would get confused with ".com" way too often, but visually and audibly. Won't hever happen. And ".bad" is just gutless. BTW, .biz is slang too (not that I like the TLD, I don't). I take it you'd prefer something like .inc?

Message Thread:

The .WEB pusher — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:39 AM (3/39)

Thanks — cambler, October 30 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

Huh? — EasyTech, October 30 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

0:253 .WEB is in, all people have to do is develop it. — Jim Fleming, October 30 @ 11:46 AM (0/0)
Are you saying. . . — 410, October 30 @ 11:43 AM (2/35)

Sure they can support their investments, but... — EasyTech, October 30 @ 4:15 PM (3/28)

EasyTech: So what is your point?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
Um... — 410, October 30 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
Very poor argument — joinin, October 30 @ 4:32 PM (1/25)

not only .WEB — EasyTech, October 30 @ 6:27 PM (2/24)

Wrong Again EasyTech.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
Great! — cambler, October 30 @ 8:08 PM (2/22)

so what's your point? — EasyTech, October 30 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

My point — cambler, October 30 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)

More substance please, Mr. Ambler — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:23 PM (2/19)

Name.space Failed Because — GettingScrewed, October 31 @ 12:34 AM (1/4)

Dot-sucks sucks really bad... — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 12:40 AM (2/3)

Dot-not, dot-bad, dot-CON much better than dot-sucks [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 2:44 AM (0/0)
.con or .bad? don't call us, we'll call you. NEXT! — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)

Dot-sucks sucks because it is such crude slang [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

I forgot something — EasyTech, October 30 @ 9:26 PM (3/13)

You forgot something even more important...."your point"....and it is??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 31 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
umm — Buddha, October 30 @ 10:16 PM (1/7)

Point is ... .web sounds pretty basal today what with .biz and .info.. so stop flaming Easy..eom — mole, October 31 @ 2:28 PM (3/6)

Thanks mole — EasyTech, October 31 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)
"basil?" — cambler, October 31 @ 3:11 PM (1/1)

He means BANAL. LOL. [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 3 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)

mole: n. A fleshy abnormal mass formed in the uterus — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:54 PM (1/2)

Greg.. you can run but you can't hide. Post in Afgan next time. — mole, October 31 @ 4:00 PM (1/1)

greg who? Afghan what? Are you on crack again?<eom> — Buddha, October 31 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

And? — cambler, October 30 @ 9:52 PM (1/3)

And... .web sounds pretty stupid today, so you missed your chance, move on. — mole, October 31 @ 2:30 PM (1/2)

Of Course "Mole" Thinks .WEB Sounds "Pretty Stupid" ... — GettingScrewed, October 31 @ 4:57 PM (1/1)

Tons, well ar.. sheesh...actually 3.. with media.club pending. well, quality, not quantity ---eom — mole, October 31 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)

AMEN! — Buddha, October 30 @ 12:31 AM (1/5)

Uh, Buddha? Oxymoron! — InternetAdvocate, October 31 @ 12:06 AM (1/4)

Uh, InternetAdvocate? Moron! — Buddha, October 31 @ 2:21 PM (2/3)

Uh, Buddha [a.k.a. Dave]? Always moron! — InternetAdvocate, November 3 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)
No respect for religion, you are very insulting — mole, October 31 @ 2:32 PM (1/1)

insulting? no respect for religion? — Buddha, October 31 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy