Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Sat, November 10, 2001 at 10:35 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Common Sense
Message:
> What I'm saying is that these are very serious charges - and if Joker.com is transparently honest, they will list every single one of the 333 names they applied for, say WHO they claim it was actually registered for, and confirm their belief that every single Trademark is true, honest and correct. This is indeed necessary to validate that they were not taken fraudulantly. If the Sunrise was 'supposed' to be for trademarks, why should anybody be against this?
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• Joker.com still recommended by Afilias...? — richard_henderson, November 9 @ 9:41 PM (1/11)
• Joker.com --- one of the best — IncompetentAfilias, November 10 @ 1:08 AM (2/10)
• What Joker.com should do to prove their "honesty" — richard_henderson, November 10 @ 8:18 AM (1/4)
• can't change anything unless there's a challenge — DaveKing2, November 10 @ 8:28 AM (1/3)
• Why I still feel sceptical about many of Joker's 333 names (many great generics) — richard_henderson, November 10 @ 10:05 AM (1/2)
• Common Sense — Garry Anderson, November 10 @ 10:35 AM (1/1)
• Common Sense says these Generics probably have FAKE trademarks! Take a look... — richard_henderson, November 10 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)
• I concur — DaveKing2, November 10 @ 2:00 AM (1/4)
• More on Joker.com — IncompetentAfilias, November 10 @ 5:51 AM (1/3)
• so, Joker charged nothing to preregister, but others like — antipodes, November 10 @ 7:23 AM (1/2)
• Yup — DaveKing2, November 10 @ 8:18 AM (1/1)
• thanks Dave - from memory it was eNom with whom Freeregistration — antipodes, November 10 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy