Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
| Username: |
InternetAdvocate |
| Date/Time: |
Tue, November 13, 2001 at 12:32 AM GMT (Mon, November 12, 2001 at 5:32 PM PDT) |
| Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0 |
| Subject: |
Bush REALLY DID win. Dimple chads are abstentions, not votes. |
Message: |
|
| The lib media counted dimple chads as votes. Dimple chads result from a change-of-mind
during the voting process when a voter decides to abstain after starting to vote
for a candidate. If you count dimple chads as votes, then you disenfranchise
voters who wanted to abstain on a particular office while voting on other offices. Dimple
chads also can result from fraud, by stacking two or more ballots together and punching
holes in them all simultaneously, thus resulting in dimple chads in the bottom ballot. Note
to the clueless: each voter shall vote only one ballot per election, not two, three,
four, five or more ballots. Duh!
Subtract all dimple chads from
the lib media's analysis of the votew total. Then you see that Bush had more
votes than Gore in Florida. Thus, Bush won Florida and thus the electoral college.
|
InternetAdvocate_is_not_IntemetAdvocate_[rn is not m]. This warning is needed, due to a fraudulent poser trying to pose as me.
|
| Link: |
Bush Wins 2000 Election Yet Again |
Message Thread:
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy