Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	GettingScrewed
Date/Time:	Wed, November 14, 2001 at 3:37 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V4.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	Well, What Do We Have Here?  Ah Yes, The New.net Groupies ...
Message:
... trying to protect their investments. Look, if New.net is so wonderful, you guys wouldn't have to rush to New.net's defense every time someone states a truth.  IMO, New.net hoodwinked their customers by starting with 20 extensions, then adding 59 more!  Hahahahahahaha.  And by the way, if you own SEX.SHOP, SEX.HOLA would certainly dilute the value of SEX.SHOP.  If Spanish is my native language, then I'll visit SEX.HOLA before SEX.SHOP.  But if .HOLA was not an available extention, I would try SEX.SHOP. But go ahead, fool yourselves.

Message Thread:

• http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/mdr2001/archive/pres/hernand.html — EasyTech, November 13 @ 10:06 PM (2/31)
• At This Point, New.net Is Screwing Themselves, And Their Customers — GettingScrewed, November 14 @ 1:05 PM (4/22)
• New.net is worthless crap: nothing from nothing means nothing — psbyowner, November 15 @ 1:02 AM (1/3)
• Nothing from nothing means nothing? — ICANN_Moderator, November 15 @ 1:07 AM (1/2)
• Screw you. — ICANN_Moderator, November 15 @ 12:56 AM (1/2)
• Typical, you ignorant... — EasyTech, November 14 @ 2:53 PM (3/10)
• U D Man! I B ignoorantee por chure.  Yeeeee Haaaaaw!  Now gimme a — ICANN_Moderator, November 15 @ 1:08 AM (1/2)
• Well, What Do We Have Here?  Ah Yes, The New.net Groupies ... — GettingScrewed, November 14 @ 3:37 PM (2/4)
• What's the truth? — EasyTech, November 14 @ 4:49 PM (0/0)
• muahahhahahaha... the sex.biz and sex.info groupies are here.... — mole, November 14 @ 4:07 PM (1/2)
• When Pets.com Went Bankrupt ... — GettingScrewed, November 14 @ 4:23 PM (1/1)
• p--e--t--s.com was probably the only domain available to you to register, point made ---eom — mole, November 14 @ 4:36 PM (0/0)
• psst.... GettingScrewed is izopod, Easy. ips and grammatical style check --eom — mole, November 14 @ 3:31 PM (1/1)
• Thanks moley — EasyTech, November 14 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
• A good example of shallow, retro thinking -- eom — mole, November 14 @ 1:27 PM (1/3)
• We have reason to believe that Mole is actually.. — pi, November 14 @ 7:18 PM (2/2)
• Pardon? -- elom — mole, November 15 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
• If you had done your homework, you would know this not to be the case - eom — spot, November 14 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)
• Hi Gregory, New.net grows faster than the USG root! :-P — EasyTech, November 13 @ 10:14 PM (2/7)
• new.net's prolific growth is impressive — Anion, November 14 @ 12:10 AM (1/4)
• Don't forget new.net has A LOT of enemies. — spot, November 14 @ 6:39 AM (1/3)
• What about .info and .biz names? I see mounting interest already. Deal with it --eom — mole, November 14 @ 7:20 AM (1/2)
• Yes, interest appears to be rapidly increasing in these, but I think most new.net advocates' problem — spot, November 14 @ 8:58 AM (1/1)
• Woof! This is New.Net. This is the New.internet. Would you rather settle for ICANN.museum?--eom — mole, November 14 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)
• You can't compare New.net and the USG root....It's stupid to try... — Gregory W Krajewski, November 13 @ 11:14 PM (1/1)
• Yeah, don't compare New.Net to .ca and .fm and .tj and .ws. and .tv and..... — mole, November 14 @ 5:53 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy