This quote says it all, "ICANN has well exceeded its narrow technical mandate"As
some people on this board will know, I am for seperate and restricted TLD to verify
source. This is quite apart from .REG - To see why, please visit: http://wipo2.wipo.int/process2/rfc/rfc3/comments/msg00074.html
Any
***OPEN*** repeat OPEN TLD, like .com, should not have words abridged - that is against
First Amendment. The US Government are either too corrupt or too ignorant to see
that.
As they have been told and understand the arguments (though it was VERY obvious
they must have known) - then they must be corrupt.
RESTRICTED TLD ARE ESSENTIAL
- ESPECIALLY .REG
The authorities are without honour - they hide this from you.
Another
quote from the link Sunil (Anion) provided shows that others can see the positive
aspects of restricted TLD:
To do that, Gaon and company have come up with a three-step
process to validate .pro candidates"
1. Domain name registration
2. Authentication
and verification; proof is required for all doctors, lawyers and accountants candidates,
requiring a background check to organizations like the American Medical Association.
3. Issuing a client digital certificate to all .pro domain name holders, as proof
of their credentials.