>"'Username: InterNetAdvocate Thu, December 13, 2001 at 4:56 PM GMT
Subject:
Drako admits to being new to English, then tries to correct me. ROFLOL'"See the
link below for Drako's post http://forum.icann.org/cgi-bin/rpgmessage.cgi?newtldagmts;3C17CB8000001C11
full of errors about which my post commented.
And ROFLOL is an extra emphasis of
LOL used by many on this forum:
LOL.......................Oh dear — spot, Sun
6:41 PM (0/0)
LoL — EasyTech, November 23 @ 2:37 AM (2/2)
That comment really
got ya, didn't it. lol. — Buddha, October 30 @ 7:44 AM (1/1)
"the wisdom of the
board" - LOL — Garry Anderson, September 27 @ 1:46 PM (0/0)
lol — psbyowner,
September 6 @ 8:47 PM (0/0)
thanks for the lol Rachel — antipodes, September
1 @ 6:27 AM (1/2)
Lol — fred48, August 30 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)
Lol....What did
you expect from Afilias? — WorldThoughts, August 30 @ 1:06 PM (0/0)
Many more,
I tired and bored.
>"This is from your post to Antipodes
'More Malarkey.
Here's the truth: Americans opposed entry in WW1 and WW2 because of their isolationist
reverence of George Washington's isolationist comments in his Farewell Address of
1797 at the end of his presidency. Roosevelt disrespected two of Washington's
traditions: two-term presidential limit and isolation from Europe's problems.'
>IntemetAdvocate
,are you inventing a new language. [isolationist reverence of] and [disrespected]".
No.
Those are real words.
And it's "I n t e r n e t Advocate", not "I n t e m e t
Advocate". [Please learn how to spell. Thanks.]
"I think you spend
to much time roling on the floor ,you should spend more time on your history and
less time making new words."
Not new words. And ROF is not literally rolling
on the floor; it's metaphorical for extra emphasis of LOL.
"Try to be more like
a man and less like a showgirl laughing all the time."
Another ad hom attack.
Of course when you or your buddies write ROFLOL or LOL or hahaha or funny, then you
think that's not showgirlish. And only showgirls enjoy laughing? I pity you!
"I
am thinking that I heve made a big mistake in writing to you as you are not serious
with your coments but trying to make others mad for a joke. Am I right."
Wrong.
Oh
BTW you did not disprove my TRUE comments about history.