Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Gregory W. Krajewski
Date/Time:	Tue, February 5, 2002 at 4:55 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Subject:	More domains = more confusion, less quality sites, more 404 page ERRORs
Message:
I'm afraid more companies are going to come in under the veil that they will "change" things for the better, but obviously the intent is clear:  Make the TM owner feel they "ABSOLUTELY" have to protect their name, and for the speculator feel like they will lose out on a "for sure" deal.  My opinion is quite simple:  We don't need anymore more domains.  Can't ANYONE see that! A snippet from the above LA Times article (which proves my point): >>>>Through the results of previous landrushes by our competitors, we have learnt that there are vast numbers of gamblers willing to invest in any speculative arena in the hope of great wealth. We now have almost an entire generation of people who have had their natural greed tweaked by decades of all-pervasive marketing. Its almost as if there were a new class - 'slack but greedy' - and its these people who we are keen to target."<<<<<<<<<<

Message Thread:

• More names available — Casino, February 5 @ 3:06 AM (2/6)
• scamming by numbers - taking the .info and .biz launch scams — antipathy, February 5 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
• More domains = more confusion, less quality sites, more 404 page ERRORs — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 5 @ 4:55 AM (3/4)
• artificial arguments — RayF, February 5 @ 3:09 PM (1/1)
• More TLDs — S. Hudgens, February 11 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)
• More restricted TLD = less confusion + less 404 page ERRORs — Garry Anderson, February 5 @ 10:13 AM (0/0)
• what about .WEB ? ;-) (eom) — EasyTech2, February 5 @ 8:00 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy