Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Sun, March 10, 2002 at 10:28 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	Sunrise is Bull* Propaganda
Message:
Though it was like trying to get blood from a stone - even Alex (LegalEagle) admits, "Yes, Sunrise was Bull* propoganda." Restricted TLDs are obviously required for trademarks. It would preclude the need for Sunrise. Then small businesses without trademark could use their name. Then peoples right to these words will not be abridged. The authorities abuse peoples rights in both respects - this is why I believe them corrupt.
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• The 6122 sunrise names of Worldnic (Verisign) — richard04, March 9 @ 10:50 PM (1/8)
• 7 months on, has Siegfried Langenbach of Joker managed to find the missing data... — richard04, March 9 @ 11:33 PM (1/7)
• The Afghan trademark loophole must STOP for all future Sunrises — moler, March 10 @ 6:05 AM (1/6)
• This highlights precisely why allocating on basis of trademarks is an arse — spot2, March 10 @ 7:41 AM (2/5)
• Suggestion: Why not get a trademark from the Principality of Sealand? — vera-city, March 10 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)
• The role of ccTLDs and trademarks — moler, March 10 @ 8:07 AM (1/3)
• Sunrise is Bull* Propaganda — Garry Anderson, March 10 @ 10:28 AM (1/2)
• The legitimacy of trademark claims — moler, March 10 @ 12:44 AM (1/1)
• 'Passing off' — Garry Anderson, March 10 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy