boss or subordinates that something can't be done for cost reasons, for time reasons,
for technological reasons - then calls into the doubt the benefits of trying to achieve
whatever it was the boss or subordinates wanted - but can't be done for the reasons
proffered. He then uses the politician's ruse of attacking the credibility
of whomever it was who wanted something done. Generally when someone begins
a personal attack on someone with differing ideas, the attacker is aware that their
own case or argument doesn't have much going for it.Should we have expected better
from the man who I think must bear responsibility for the culture of corruption that
is now evident in ICANN's governance of the DNS and which made possible the scams
and shams of the .info and .biz launches?
Will will anything change while Stuart
Lynn retains a position at the top of the authority responsible for DNS governance?
It
is ICANN's governance of the DNS which is the joke, not the contributions of this
forum's posters who want ICANN to be ethical and accountable and transparent.