Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Venster
Date/Time:	Wed, June 28, 2000 at 3:54 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Score:	5
Subject:	More splitting of hairs
Message:
Thank you for letting me have schneiders.new. I do not want it. (Don't tell anyone, but I have schneiders.org. But I would still not want the .new, if I hadn't.) As for ccTLDs being used for gTLDs: that is a fact. It may not be beauty.cc, but it is real.as. In fact the opening up of .net and .org was the end of structure and prettiness in TLD-structures. So why moan about this? Accept it and face this reality: Everyone wants their .com name. The ccTLDs are second or third choice. So will .web and their likes be. They are not and never will be nobledot.com's. So why have more of them? Enough! .
Link:	Enough, more than enough.

Message Thread:

• ICANN...You Must Consider This! — Voice Of Reason, June 23 @ 7:51 PM (1/16)
• Beauty.cc — Garry Anderson, June 24 @ 6:23 PM (1/15)
• No beauty — Venster, June 27 @ 5:29 AM (2/14)
• LOL — WorldThoughts, June 27 @ 10:12 AM (0/0)
• You missed the points. — Garry Anderson, June 27 @ 8:00 AM (1/12)
• More splitting of hairs — Venster, June 28 @ 3:54 AM (2/11)
• .web never will be nobledot.com's — friedrich, June 28 @ 12:37 AM (2/5)
• Arguments — Venster, June 30 @ 8:55 PM (1/1)
• .com — friedrich, July 1 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
• Nobledot.COM's — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 1:44 PM (1/2)
• You heard it here first: .com dominance temporary — joshwa, July 1 @ 2:10 AM (1/1)
• You answered your own question — Garry Anderson, July 1 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
• Hairy Man ;-) — Garry Anderson, June 28 @ 9:34 AM (1/4)
• The bottomline proves my point... — Venster, June 30 @ 8:52 PM (1/3)
• The bottomline proves MY point... — Garry Anderson, July 1 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)
• Theory, theory, theory — Venster, July 2 @ 6:34 PM (1/1)
• Yes But — Garry Anderson, July 2 @ 6:58 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy