>Bret, > >why doesn't .name fulfill this need
already? > >vint
I am surprised at this comment.
.name is purportedly a name space for individual
users, but users must fit into a hierarchical
structure controlled by the registry and it must
also use email services provided by the registry
operator.
Some consumers might like this. Others might
not. Why not let them decide?
We don't tell Toyota that we won't allow them
to sell cars because we already have GM And Ford.
Why should we tell .iii that we don't need it
because
we have some tangentially related TLD?
|