[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: newIANA (was Fram behind closed doors via opaque channels)
- To: vcerf@MCI.NET (vinton g. cerf)
- Subject: Re: newIANA (was Fram behind closed doors via opaque channels)
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jul 98 7:27:51 JST
- Cc: jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com, brian@hursley.ibm.com, me@hursley.ibm.com, discussion-draft@giaw.org, anybody@hursley.ibm.com, Stef@nma.com, ietf@ietf.org, DOMAIN-POLICY@lists.internic.net, comments@iana.org, Iana@iana.org, List@giaw.org, newcase.atr@usdoj.gov
- In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from "vinton g. cerf" at Jul 11, 98 2:07 pm
Vint;
> I hope it will prove possible for us to step back from
> the temptation, often so hard to resist, to engage in
> ad hominem ("personal" for the latin-impaired) exchanges
> and to focus our collective energy on the very important
> effort to achieve rough consensus on the new IANA
> organization.
Agreed.
But, I think meetings called for "the WP" is just closed private
meetings of people who happened to be interested in a private
opinion of USG that we should have "a US local IANA corporation"
and are not a part of the open discussion on "the new IANA
organization", which is not "a US local IANA corporation".
Masataka Ohta
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy