[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comments to "Implementation of a New IANA Organization"
Folks,
Please receive these simple comments from a person having been involved
with NORID (http://www.uninett.no/navn/english.html) for a long time,
now head of the section in which the Norwegian Internet Domain Name
Registry, NORID is organized.
1. The document is an excellent basis for achieving what we want,
a stable continuation of securing the "diamonds" of the Internet.
2. Offices.
Instead of saying WHERE the offices should be, I think it
would have been better to set up some requirements that should
be fullfilled by the main office and the additional offices.
Like: Stable democracy.
Sufficiant availability of qualified personnel
before Sept 30.
Smooth transition from current IANA.
etc.
In any case we may end up with offices in California, but with
the requirements we could skip the everlasting US/NON US debate.
3. It is not clear to me what is a "Supporting Organization".
4. Funding.
The natural structure for funding is to have a f. ex. yearly
fee for organizations using the newIANA-services, probably
based on size of local rgister. Example: NORID should pay to
newIANA a small yearly fee per subdomain under .no . I stress
that this should be a SMALL fee (a few cents) based on estimates
for the global address situation.
Yes, I agree that this might be a problem for countries with
unfunded registries, therefore one could open up for sponsors,
like Governments (US?) or others, or perhaps we could find a
scheeme where everybody is happy, and some pay and some do not
pay... The essence here is that the money funding newIANA should
come from the users of the newIANA-services in principle.
That is all. Good luck and keep up the good work.
Best regards,
--
Alf Hansen Address: UNINETT A/S
N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
Visiting address Tempeveien 22, 4. etg.
Trondheim
Sentralbord: +47 73 55 79 00 E-mail: Alf.Hansen@uninett.no
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy