Re: [alac] Minimum requirements for participation
Izumi AIZU wrote: 1. reading the ALAC-related mailing lists Agree on both - they are non-measurable, but still I think we should list them as a principle commitment to be undertaken. My idea would be that the minimum requirements could be: - explicitly casting a vote (including abstention, of course) in at least 2/3 of the ALS votes Yes, but I think we should allow for the case where someone is offline for two or three weeks, for any possible reason (vacation, illness, whatever - even missing the vote call or losing email). One could think of allowing "justifications", i.e. the Committee could excuse someone for not meeting the requirement, if he/she can provide a good reason. This, however, brings more "bureaucracy" into the process, so I would rather allow for a small percentage of absences (by the way, full participation is an important criteria for being an ALAC member, but not the only one). I think that 9 or 12 months is a reasonable span of time to measure participation - less than that would be a problem in case of special periods in private life / daytime jobs, more would not be effective. Other opinions? Even six months would be fine by me, if we think it is better to be more reactive. -- vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<----- http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...
|