Re: [alac] RE: [alac-admin] Re: [ga] More ALAC Follies

[Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ha scritto:
> Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > we do not grant exclusives to our
> > applicants, we just verify whether they meet some basic criteria.
>
>
> What criteria?!  As Richard Henderson pointed, out most of your approved
> alac 'structures' don't even have a web site, and those few who do have NO
> web based mechanisms for user interaction/input/discussion!
>
> Give it up Vittorio!  The sham is now patently clear to everyone.  You and
> your alac DO NOT represent dns users in any way shape or form; you
> represent yourselves and you're simply another group of snouts feeding at
> the ICANN trough as Abel Wisman pointed out...  Shame on you (but you
> probably have no concept of shame anyway).

Sorry, you and some other long-time GA participants seem to have a very 
strange concept of dialogue. I am more than happy to discuss successes 
and failures of the ALAC model both publicly and privately - in fact, 
this is one of the major items on our Vancouver agenda - but only on the 
basis of reciprocal respect.
Thanks,
--
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...