RE: [alac] ICANN blows off Ed Hasbrouck

["Roberto Gaetano" <alac_liaison@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

What I do not like is that action from ICANN is required in order to have an 
independent review.
A reasonable approach would be that a person who feels materially damaged by 
an ICANN action could start the appeal, and then it would be a problem of 
him/her and the court of appeal to agree on format, receivability, 
applicability, etc.
Obviously, a discussion is going on in the Board at this time, and this is 
the position I am presenting (long term solution). For the short term, I 
would be inclined to recommend the Board to let the appeal go to the ICC for 
IRP, but I would like to see discussion going in ALAC before presenting a 
position.
Regards,
Roberto GAETANO
ALAC
ICANN BoD Liaison





> From: "John R Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "ALAC" <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [alac] ICANN blows off Ed Hasbrouck
> Date: 19 Jan 2006 23:21:27 -0500
>
> Ed Hasbrouck writes about his latest correspondence from ICANN, in which
> John Jefferiwes says that merely because Vint made a public promise to do
> the independent review of .TRAVEL that Ed requested, as required by the
> ICANN bylaws, doesn't mean that they actually will, or that if they did
> they would do anything meaningful:
>
> http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/000997.html
>
> Also see Bret's comments, entitled "ICANN is Never Wrong":
>
> http://blog.lextext.com/blog/_archives/2006/1/19/1714991.html
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for 
> Dummies",
> Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor
> "I shook hands with Senators Dole and Inouye," said Tom, disarmingly.

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/