RE: [alac] ICANN blows off Ed Hasbrouck
What I do not like is that action from ICANN is required in order to have an independent review.
A reasonable approach would be that a person who feels materially damaged by an ICANN action could start the appeal, and then it would be a problem of him/her and the court of appeal to agree on format, receivability, applicability, etc.
Obviously, a discussion is going on in the Board at this time, and this is the position I am presenting (long term solution). For the short term, I would be inclined to recommend the Board to let the appeal go to the ICC for IRP, but I would like to see discussion going in ALAC before presenting a position.
ICANN BoD Liaison
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxx> To: "ALAC" <alac@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [alac] ICANN blows off Ed Hasbrouck Date: 19 Jan 2006 23:21:27 -0500
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/