Re: [alac] Fwd: [ttcs] .xxx rejected 9-5

[Jean Armour Polly <mom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I know, isn't it awful? You notice it didn't make the Net-mom 
Approved list! :-)

At 7:22 PM -0400 5/11/06, Wendy Seltzer recently said:
> At 06:46 PM 5/11/2006, John R Levine wrote:
> >  > So... US Congress went ahead and mandated a kids.us. secondary in
> > >  2003. Spectacular flop. So restrictive that they can only link to
> > >  each other. There are less than 30 sites in there last time I
> > >  checked. I reviewed them all  last year
> > >  http://www.netmom.com/displayarticle48.html
> >
> > Yeah, but the mummify your pet site at http://summum.kids.us/ makes the
> > whole domain worthwhile.
>
> Wow.  Apparently it's kid-safe to advertise services to foster 
> necrophilia but not to talk about s*e*x.   Love it.
>
> --Wendy
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/