<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [alac] new ALS applicant North America
- To: "'Jean Armour Polly'" <mom@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Wendy Seltzer'" <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [alac] new ALS applicant North America
- From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 01:10:42 +0200
I think that issue tracking is essential if we want to get our act together.
Roberto Gaetano
ALAC
ICANN Board Liaison
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jean Armour Polly
> Sent: 04 August 2006 23:28
> To: Wendy Seltzer
> Cc: ALAC
> Subject: RE: [alac] new ALS applicant North America
>
> Larry says there are plenty of Mambo components (for example)
> that would provide us with a ticketing system. We would just
> have to develop criteria so he can select one that matches
> what we want.
>
> Last month when this came up I don't think more than a few
> people wanted to pursue getting a ticket system to track this
> sort of thing plus other things, like when we have to vote,
> like when we have to submit advisories, etc.
>
> Who is interested in issue tracking besides Wendy,
> Jacqueline, and myself? If most of us think it is a good idea
> maybe we can pass around a feature list of things we want it
> to be able to do.
>
> JP
>
>
>
>
> At 12:05 PM -0400 8/4/06, Wendy Seltzer recently said:
> >At 09:45 AM 8/4/2006 -0400, John L wrote:
> >>>Actually, there have been two applications by email, received at
> >>>als@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, that I was assuming all of us are currently
> >>>registered after the latest discussions on email list organization.
> >>
> >>I don't recall seeing them. I fear that the als@ list is still two
> >>years out of date.
> >
> >Yes. Conversations with Kent seem to have broken off without any
> >changes to the lists (except finally correcting Hong's
> adress) -- I'll
> >make one more effort to re-start.
> >
> >Either way, we need one person (ideally, staff) who does get the
> >messages to keep a list (ideally in a ticket tracking
> system) and keep
> >us on track with the review and approval process. It makes no sense
> >for each of us to have to follow them all individually.
> >
> >--Wendy
> >
> >
> >--
> >Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Fellow,
> >Berkman Center for Internet & Society
> >http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> >Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|