ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [alac] new ALS applicant North America

  • To: "'Jean Armour Polly'" <mom@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Wendy Seltzer'" <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [alac] new ALS applicant North America
  • From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 01:10:42 +0200

I think that issue tracking is essential if we want to get our act together.

Roberto Gaetano
ALAC
ICANN Board Liaison
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Jean Armour Polly
> Sent: 04 August 2006 23:28
> To: Wendy Seltzer
> Cc: ALAC
> Subject: RE: [alac] new ALS applicant North America
> 
> Larry says there are plenty of Mambo components (for example) 
> that would provide us with a ticketing system. We would just 
> have to develop criteria so he can select one that matches 
> what we want.
> 
> Last month when this came up I don't think more than a few 
> people wanted to pursue getting a ticket system to track this 
>  sort of thing plus other things, like when we have to vote, 
> like when we have to submit advisories, etc.
> 
> Who is interested in issue tracking besides Wendy, 
> Jacqueline, and myself? If most of us think it is a good idea 
> maybe we can pass around a feature list of things we want it 
> to be able to do.
> 
> JP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 12:05 PM -0400 8/4/06, Wendy Seltzer recently said:
> >At 09:45 AM 8/4/2006 -0400, John L wrote:
> >>>Actually, there have been two applications by email, received at 
> >>>als@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, that I was assuming all of us are currently 
> >>>registered after the latest discussions on email list organization.
> >>
> >>I don't recall seeing them.  I fear that the als@ list is still two 
> >>years out of date.
> >
> >Yes.  Conversations with Kent seem to have broken off without any 
> >changes to the lists (except finally correcting Hong's 
> adress) -- I'll 
> >make one more effort to re-start.
> >
> >Either way, we need one person (ideally, staff) who does get the 
> >messages to keep a list (ideally in a ticket tracking 
> system) and keep 
> >us on track with the review and approval process.  It makes no sense 
> >for each of us to have to follow them all individually.
> >
> >--Wendy
> >
> >
> >--
> >Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Fellow, 
> >Berkman Center for Internet & Society 
> >http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> >Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy