ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [alac] [fwd] [gnso-dow123] Call for constituency statements (from: jordyn.buchanan@gmail.com)

  • To: "Wendy Seltzer" <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [alac] [fwd] [gnso-dow123] Call for constituency statements (from: jordyn.buchanan@gmail.com)
  • From: "Nick Ashton-Hart" <nashton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:45:46 +0000

I'm going to potentially show my ignorance here. When ALAC comes to a
consensus, how does it then interact with the ALS community in order
to get any comments from them? How are those comments then
incorporated into the final output document?

On 26/11/06, Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Of course we're not a constituency, but we can also submit comments to the 
WHOIS TF report as an entity, if we have a consensus position.

I'd recommend thatt ALAC support the OPOC proposal, as it proovides at least some privacy for 
registrants by letting them list a "point of contact" rather than hhaving to list their 
contact info publicly. This seems to strike a balance between contactability and privacy (though I 
personally would prefer even more privacy).  Note that the "special circumstances" 
proposal would force registrants to justify their desire for privacy and would eliminate proxy 
registrations, neither of which I think is in the interest of the individual registrant.

--Wendy

----- Forwarded message from Jordyn Buchanan <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx> -----

From: "Jordyn Buchanan" <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:18:21 -0500
Subject: [gnso-dow123] Call for constituency statements
Reply-To: jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        
b=We5voIjU5QLXZnob5h52OORK/I5nIdIzUG17AssThd0bkjG5rH1dEx5ftyXUSyULy6AsxQVZEsnY4hx4bq+YMfToAXtbZG1iuEVqoAVl+M8toPxhh6E2HMxhtLtB6y1LcZdOIWFgxCnGAyMPUsXUjskIVAieQNwLvTov+QH/7Ps=

Task Force Representatives:

As previously discussed, I am now making a call for Constituency Statements
on our Terms of Reference items #2, #3 and #4 (the topics covered by our
current report).  Constituencies are asked to provide statements to the task
force no later than January 15, 2006.

Please let me know if you have any questions about this,

Jordyn

----- End forwarded message -----

--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx || wendy.seltzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org/



--
--
Regards,

Nick Ashton-Hart
PO Box 32160
London N4 2XY
United Kingdom
UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011
USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
Win IM: ashtonhart@xxxxxxxxxxx / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@xxxxxxx /
Skype: nashtonhart
Online Bio:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy