ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [bc-gnso] Comments on the IRT draft report

  • To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Comments on the IRT draft report
  • From: George Kirikos <icann@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:40:03 -0400


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> bravo George.

Thanks for the kind words, Mike.

I almost didn't believe it when I read it, but a very candid remark
was made in today's IRT comments archive by someone from NAF (one of
the UDRP providers):


"Complainants have pushed, and Panelists have taken the opportunity,
over time, to broaden the scope of the UDRP, but it started out as a
mechanism only for clear cut cases of cybersquatting."

For many of us who are appalled at some of the decisions that panels
make, a statement like that from the actual provider is invaluable in
the event one ever wants to challenge a UDRP decision in real court.


George Kirikos

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy