RE: [bc-gnso] IRT Final report

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd like to urge that we move ahead with implementing the parts of the CSG 
approach that would move administrative functions into centralized and ICANN 
staff supported support mechanism. Even if the 'seating' of the Policy Council 
is delayed, there are other pending recommendations that are about the 
administration/management functions that can move ahead. I'd like to have those 
remain on the discussion and priority list for change.  

As a small business OR a large business, what is important is that one meets 
the criteria for membership, and that there is complete neutrality in the 
application of membership criteria. I am not aware that any member is required 
to post their details to all other members. 
:-) 
However if this was just an indirect way [this is a joke] to propose a new BC 
'social network' for getting acquainted with each other, sorry, I have too much 
work to do responding to all of ICANN's public comment processes!  


> From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
> To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bc-gnso] IRT Final report
> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:31:56 +0200
> 
> 
> 
> George, 
> I imply nothing.
> Its just that I know nothing about your company, its business objectives, 
> global
> reach and staffing.
> 
> Philip pp AIM
>