<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [bc-gnso] Ballot for a new BC Charter -- suggestion on how to proceed -- "interim" charter, followed by thoughtful revision
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Ballot for a new BC Charter -- suggestion on how to proceed -- "interim" charter, followed by thoughtful revision
- From: Liz Williams <lizawilliams@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:08:57 +0100
Mikey
Great that you have a long drive -- it stimulates the brain cells.
I like this idea as it gives incentives for those that have opposing/
different/alternative ideas to present them in a cogent and complete
way given that it seems a vote now is premature. It assumes that
there is some kind of election to enable this to move forward?
Best wishes and drive carefully.
Liz
On 14 Oct 2009, at 14:05, Mike O'Connor wrote:
hello all,
given that time is short, and we need to have a charter in place at
Seoul, how about this for an idea?
- put forth at least two competing charters and vote between them,
rather than on just one. maybe one of the proposed charters could
be based on the staff-supplied charter template? either way the
vote comes out, we'll have a charter (plus a sense of which charter
approach the group prefers).
- approve an instruction to the (new) officers that we revise that
interim charter in an orderly/thoughtful/less-harried way over the
next three (two? six?) months
just a quick thought before jumping back into my submarine (er, car)
for another rainy day of driving to New Orleans.
mikey
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of BC Secretariat
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:09 AM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] Ballot for a new BC Charter
Dear Members
Ballot on revised BC Charter
At the request of the BC Officers and with reference to the message
below, I have today opened a 7-day voting period for the newly
revised BC Charter.
A majority approval vote means the new Charter will be adopted. A
majority non-approval vote means the Charter will not be adopted.
A ballot form is attached. Each member organisation has one vote.
The vote should be placed by the principle BC contact for the
membership organsiation or by notified proxy. I will apply weighted
voting when I receive your ballot form. All ballots will be
acknowledged.
The voting period closes at midnight in your time zone on Monday 19
October 2009. Ballots cannot be accepted after this time.
Best wishes
Gary
----------------------------------------------------
We would like to ask all members to cast their vote in favour of
the attached revised BC Charter.
A definitive PDF version is attached.
A Word version showing recent track changes is also provided for
information.
The Charter accommodates necessary changes for the re-structured
GNSO in which the stakeholder groups provide representatives to the
GNSO council.
As such the BC will move from a situation in which its three GNSO
representatives were also BC Officers, to a separation of these
roles.
There will be a new executive committee with a chair and two vice-
chairs in addition to the two representatives to the GNSO Council.
The Charter also includes other changes recommended by members and
ICANN staff based on learning since the last Charter.
The officers have done their best to accommodate all member
perspectives given the diversity of those perspectives.
The Board has requested Constituencies complete work on Charter
revision by Seoul.
Zahid Jamil
Mike Rodenbaugh
Philip Sheppard
BC Officers
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|