RE: [bc-gnso] Charter - Councilor's vote
- To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "'BC gnso'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Charter - Councilor's vote
- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:35:55 -0500
I may be overlooking it, but can you point out where in the new Charter it
explicitly notes that the BC representatives to the Council will vote
according to the wishes of the constituency? As we experienced in Seoul,
one of our representatives declared he is not bound by the view of the
constituency and has a right to vote from his personal perspective. I
think everyone in the BC is of like mind on this matter, i.e., our
representative MUST vote the constituencies position.
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10001
V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11
F: +1 212 481 2859
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sent: 2009-11-10 08:50
To: 'BC gnso'
Subject: [bc-gnso] Charter
On Marilyn's comment re the Charter. the present wording about prime
interest should cover it.
If it leads to any problems in the future lets address it with a real case
in front of us not a speculative one.
Any individual piece of the charter can be amended if it proves unfit for
In the meantime dear BC members please VOTE !