[bc-gnso] Anzaja: resignation
- To: "Liz Williams" <lizawilliams@xxxxxxx>, "Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] Anzaja: resignation
- From: "Rick Anderson" <RAnderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:31:32 -0700
Liz, I can understand your feelings (being someone who's not yet
succeeded in a BC election and prone to thinking that it can be a closed
circle with contributions underappreciated).
But know that that there are many of us who do value your contribution
and hope you will reconsider. We are at an important time in our
evolution as a constituency/stakeholder group and you are 100% correct
that opening up is what we must do.
EVP, InterBorder Holdings Ltd.
cell: (403) 830-1798
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Liz Williams
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 9:48 AM
To: Michael D. Palage
Cc: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Anzaja: resignation
Thanks very much Michael
However, I didn't make the decision lightly. My views were well known
within the membership circle and I did what I said I was going to do.
The BC is closing down not opening up and it certainly isn't opening
up to new voices from different places who care about wider business
issues -- my consulting interest is a minor part of my broader
business life. ICANN will have to deal with that at an organisational
Best wishes and, yes, always mutual respect even if there are
On 5 Feb 2010, at 15:58, Michael D. Palage wrote:
> If there is one thing I have learned in 11 years of ICANN battles,
> is that
> it is best to sometimes take 24 hours before sending certain emails.
> the better part of those 11 years we have sometimes been on the same
> side of
> an issue or the opposite side of an issue, regardless I think there
> always been a mutual respect.
> I understand and appreciate your concerns but resigning does not
> seem to be
> part of the solution, but appears to add to the problem a lack of geo
> graphic diversity within the BC. As a sort of nomad of the GNSO,
> participating in various constituencies, may I recommend maintaining
> membership in the BC and look to get involved in other
> constituencies. By
> the way, the Registry Constituency just approved the process for
> members to join. Based on your work with CORE this would seem to be a
> natural fit with some of the new gTLD would are likely to be doing.
> As a
> consultant much like yourself, I find the different viewpoints voiced
> /advocated within different constituencies constructive.
> As a long time member of the BC, I have seen an ebb and flow in the
> and its make-up. Play the long game, stay engaged and things will
> they always do.
> Just my two cents.
> Best regards,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of
> Liz Williams
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 10:14 AM
> To: bc - GNSO list
> Subject: [bc-gnso] Anzaja: resignation
> Dear colleagues
> There is little point in being part of an organisation so dominated by
> US based interests. There is nought to congratulate ourselves about
> being so clearly dominated by one particular group when there are such
> broader issues at stake. We have failed substantially to meet our
> charter obligations and the new executive committee will have a large
> task on its hands to ensure a fresh and innovative approach to
> representing business interests across the board.
> I have asked Gary to remove me from BC membership with immediate
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or
privileged information intended only for the addressee. In the event this
e-mail is sent to you in error, sender and sender’s company do not waive
confidentiality or privilege, and waiver may not be assumed. Any dissemination,
distribution or copying of, or action taken in reliance on, the contents of
this e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
have been sent this e-mail in error, please destroy all copies and notify
sender at the above e-mail address.
Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. You should check this e-mail
message and any attachments for viruses. Sender and sender’s company accept no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. Like
other forms of communication, e-mail communications may be vulnerable to
interception by unauthorized parties. If you do not wish to communicate by
e-mail, please notify sender. In the absence of such notification, your consent
is assumed. Sender will not take any additional security measures (such as
encryption) unless specifically requested.