<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] BC Position Statement on Vertical Integration (VI)-- single registrant TLDs
- To: <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] BC Position Statement on Vertical Integration (VI)-- single registrant TLDs
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:34:59 +0200
I too agree on case 1 and understand the complexity with the other cases.
My default in such cases is that unless one can be watertight in the definition,
then erring on the side of caution is probably better.
However, as BC members we need to think what is the best model for commercial
users, not what is best for one registry or other.
So I'm not very sympathetic to the fate of the dot.social registry !!
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|