ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] Vertical integration - Board says yes

  • To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Vertical integration - Board says yes
  • From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:30:32 -0500

>From a BC perspective, Philip is correct that we lost the debate.  The
concerns about registrars having access to registry data and the harms that
can arise around such issues do need to be addressed, in my view.  Therefore
I support Philip's suggestion that the BC submit a recommendation to make
the safeguards explicit.  There is also work that still needs to be done on
policy around SRSU/SRMU, if my understanding of the Board's VI resolution is
correct.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

 

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

  _____  

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:05 AM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] Vertical integration - Board says yes

 

Re Board resolution

http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-05nov10-en.htm

 

It seems we have lost the debate.

Are the Board safeguards sufficient?

Should we work on a paper to make them explicit?

Philip

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy